This came to me again recently when someone asked me for advice. He was about to leave his current giant employer for another employer that was much smaller, but was well on its way to being public. From a business point of view, neither company had significant risk. Yet he wavered. "I have two pre-school kids, and I cant afford to take the risk of even joining a high quality startup such as OSMeta."
Heres the deal. If you join a smaller company from a giant firm or even a tiny startup, and then face new challenges, overcome them, and work with really smart people, theres zero chance that if everything goes belly up over the next few years the giant corporation will not hire you. Zero. By contrast, if you do spend your time at a large corporation with reduced risk and perhaps a fat package that comes to you every year no matter what happens, would you push yourself as hard? (Some people might: if youre one of them, this does not apply to you, and youre probably a super star at the large corporation anyway and are not reading this) And if you dont manage to push yourself as hard and giant corporation falls onto bad times, whats going to happen? You could be pushed out of your job (by better politicians, perhaps), and now youre actually less employable than if youd taken the small company "higher risk" job.
So what I think is that people inflate the risk of going solo, doing the startup thing, or even joining a smaller firm, and forget the risk of staying stagnant at a large corporation where you might not get a chance to stretch, and the political game is far more vicious as its practiced by many people who have nothing better to do all day precisely because the business faces effectively no risk. Startups eliminate such behavior because if you dont pull your weight, its very obvious and the business is at risk, and good startups fire such people.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar